Been thinking about whether there are some endorsements a candidate would rather not have, or slates you don't want to be on.

So I included a link to the CH Watch endorsement on my website, because while I think they go overboard on many things, they add an interesting voice and question things sometimes that need to be.  I didn't publicize any beyond that, because of the reasons you list above. One a slightly different question, we received a questionnaire from Triangle Conservatives United (http://tcu.triangleconservativesunite.com/2011/08/24/school-board-summar...).  It was early in the campaign (August) and I struggled a bit on whether to answer it.  I would not have linked to an endorsement from them if it had come, but I did decide that the questions were good enough questions (ie, not leading as I would have expected) to write up answers to.  It has been interesting because I've seen web searches and hits on my site because of that link.  I didn't say anything I don't believe in the questionnaire, so I hope it showed conservatives where I stand without scaring off too many liberals.  If the questions had been different, I wouldn't have bothered to try to answer, but as I said, it depends.  :)