public participation
A few days ago I sent the following message to my fellow members of the Outreach Committee for Chapel Hill 2020. Apparently having and stating strong opinions is incompatible with leadership in that process. Rather than spending time struggling to lead the internal outreach process, I think I will be a more effective and way more authentic advocate from the outside. It's a pity the Town can't make room for vocally opinionated comunity members to be leaders in creating our new comprehensive plan. We all have opinions. Some people are just more blunt about them than others. There are precious few "neutral" leaders who are qualified and motivated enough to serve.
Though the holiday season is now in full swing, the Chapel Hill 2020 will press forward with the second round of key theme group working sessions Thursday. The meetings will be held at Frank Porter Graham Elementary School on Smith Level Road from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. They promise to follow essentially the same format as the first round of meetings. The key difference is that before breaking off into seperate theme meetings, Town Manager Roger Stancil will give a presentation on the fiscal state of the town.
As
many of you probably know, the first report out session from the Chapel Hill 2020
theme groups was held at Chapel Hill High School. The session included an
overview of the process thus far, advice from UNC School of Government
facilitators as to how best keep discussions focused, updates from each of the
theme groups as to what was discussed at the first theme group meeting, a
community and open-mic discussion of the issues that the town will confront.
The event was fairly well-attended and a poll of those present suggested that
about 20% to 25% of the participants had never attended a Chapel Hill 2020
meeting before. Looking at the meeting through the public participation lens, a
few things emerged:
Tomorrow morning will mark the first report out session for the six theme groups in Chapel Hill 2020, the process to create the town's new Comprehensove Plan. These report out sessions are designed so that all the theme groups can get together to find areas of agreement and discuss agrees of disagreement. The theme groups have a good deal of overlap, so these large group meetings are necessary to ensure that the plan is cohesive while still being comprehensive.
First, the leadership team will be providing a summary of the process. They’ll give a little more explanation as to where we are and where we’re going in the near future, and they’ll highlight some of the resources available on the web and outreach efforts that are being conducted by the town.
You may have noticed an
editorial in Wednesday’s edition of the Durham Herald-Sun concerning the Chapel
Hill 2020 process. It’s author—Chapel Hill
resident and writer Joe Buonfiglio—points out some conflicts of interest that
may be present in the theme group structure and argues that the public input
process will result in a plan with only “the mere
appearance of citizens running the narrative.” While Mr. Buonfiglio makes some
legitimate points about the weaknesses of the process thus far, I would argue
that the 2020
process features more involvement than past planning
efforts in Chapel Hill and than can be seen in other similarly-sized cities around
the country.
Pages
About Us
OrangePolitics is a not-for-profit website for discussing progressive perspectives on politics, planning, and public policy in Orange County, NC. Opinions are those of their authors. Learn more.
Community Guidelines
By using this site, you agree to our community guidelines. Inappropriate or disruptive behavior will result in moderation or eviction.
Zircon - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
Design by
WeebPal.
